AztecMesa - ObamaCare and the Supreme Court

« ObamaCare and the Supreme Court »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19, 2013, 6:34am

........ Aztec Mesa - Your Home for Aztec Talk!

AztecMesa :: Politics :: Health Care/Insurance :: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court

« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page Go

Author

Topic: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court (Read 837 times)

aztecwin
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It is hard to be humble when you are an Aztec

Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,812
Location: Valley Center/Escondido

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #20 on Apr 7, 2012, 7:35pm »

Apr 7, 2012, 3:51pm, aztec70 wrote:

Apr 7, 2012, 3:42pm, aztecwin wrote:

Was that meant as a compliment? I take it that way.

I meant it as an accurate description. If you think that it is a compliment, that's fine.

I had no idea that you held me in such high esteem. Nutcase? Term of endearment? Are you sure you are straight?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything.

Did I get stiffed on a shirt?

aztecwin
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It is hard to be humble when you are an Aztec

Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,812
Location: Valley Center/Escondido

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #21 on Apr 30, 2012, 2:14pm »

Here is a speech that gives a straight shooters take on ObamaKare.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7n2m-X7OIuY

Note the meaning of "regulate" and how the Commerce Clause has been misused.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything.

Did I get stiffed on a shirt?

aztec70
Coordinator

member is offline

Joined: Jun 2010
Gender: Male

Posts: 5,364

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #22 on Apr 30, 2012, 5:00pm »

Apr 30, 2012, 2:14pm, aztecwin wrote:

Here is a speech that gives a straight shooters take on ObamaKare.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7n2m-X7OIuY

Note the meaning of "regulate" and how the Commerce Clause has been misused.

Wow. A Fox commentator disagrees with Obama. Breaking news!

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. Adam Smith

aztecwin
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It is hard to be humble when you are an Aztec

Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,812
Location: Valley Center/Escondido

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #23 on Apr 30, 2012, 5:28pm »

Apr 30, 2012, 5:00pm, aztec70 wrote:

Apr 30, 2012, 2:14pm, aztecwin wrote:

Here is a speech that gives a straight shooters take on ObamaKare.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7n2m-X7OIuY

Note the meaning of "regulate" and how the Commerce Clause has been misused.

Wow. A Fox commentator disagrees with Obama. Breaking news!

If that is your take, you did not look.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything.

Did I get stiffed on a shirt?

AlwaysAnAztec
Coordinator

member is offline

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,129

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #24 on Apr 30, 2012, 6:56pm »

Apr 30, 2012, 5:28pm, aztecwin wrote:

Apr 30, 2012, 5:00pm, aztec70 wrote:

Wow. A Fox commentator disagrees with Obama. Breaking news!

If that is your take, you did not look.

Quote:

Andrew Paolo Napolitano (born June 6, 1950) is a former New Jersey Superior Court Judge. He is a political and legal analyst for Fox News Channel, commenting on legal news and trials. Napolitano started on the channel in 1998

The guy sure qualifies as a constitutional scholar doesn't he.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

aztecwin
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It is hard to be humble when you are an Aztec

Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,812
Location: Valley Center/Escondido

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #25 on May 1, 2012, 1:52pm »

Apr 30, 2012, 6:56pm, AlwaysAnAztec wrote:

Apr 30, 2012, 5:28pm, aztecwin wrote:

If that is your take, you did not look.

Quote:

The guy sure qualifies as a constitutional scholar doesn't he.

If you say so it must be. He seems to make a lot of money and has enough cred to get speaking engagements so you are just adding to what I thought.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything.

Did I get stiffed on a shirt?

AlwaysAnAztec
Coordinator

member is offline

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,129

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #26 on May 1, 2012, 4:59pm »

May 1, 2012, 1:52pm, aztecwin wrote:

Apr 30, 2012, 6:56pm, AlwaysAnAztec wrote:

The guy sure qualifies as a constitutional scholar doesn't he.

If you say so it must be. He seems to make a lot of money and has enough cred to get speaking engagements so you are just adding to what I thought.

Yup. He makes a lot of money at speaking engagements talking to people just like you.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

aztecwin
Coordinator

member is offline

[avatar]

It is hard to be humble when you are an Aztec

Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,812
Location: Valley Center/Escondido

Re: ObamaCare and the Supreme Court
« Reply #27 on May 1, 2012, 6:42pm »

May 1, 2012, 4:59pm, AlwaysAnAztec wrote:

May 1, 2012, 1:52pm, aztecwin wrote:

If you say so it must be. He seems to make a lot of money and has enough cred to get speaking engagements so you are just adding to what I thought.

Yup. He makes a lot of money at speaking engagements talking to people just like you.

I see, you give in.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything.

Did I get stiffed on a shirt?

« Page 2 of 2 Jump to page Go

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free